data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc960/cc9607ea9ec8276c656fb548a2b07436f69649a4" alt=""
All three of them were filled with Montblanc Irish Green and have been used on the same papers, mostly a smooth 90 g/sq. m by Oxford. My conclusions are as follows:
— The steel nib is a tad thinner that those in gold. The two gold nibs show no difference in their widths.
— The 18 K gold nib is clearly the wettest of the lot. Its line is significantly darker than those laid by the other two nibs.
— All three nibs are smooth regardless of the paper. The differences in this department are very small.
— None of these nibs is flexible. However, the 18 K gold one is slightly more responsive to pressure.
— As was the case with medium nibs, the steel one comes only as gold plated in chromium-finished bodies. Therefore, those pens show a color mismatch. A strange detail given the fact that no nib plating would be needed to match it with the rest of the pen.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aca93/aca9303c1ce6b65dafa3f9505d76cdcf04326c17" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1487/c1487e2ae6f6e64f4efaa8d455b8f910425b9122" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4154d/4154d40ce0762b8e55e8bdc8e4429f8724afe765" alt=""
Probably, the richer flow makes the 18 K gold nib the best of the tested nibs, although this, I reckon, is a matter of personal preference. On the cheaper side, the inexpensive steel nib gives an excellent value—it is smooth and reliable nib whose performance is on a par with the other two. Its only problem is, other than the very limited distribution outside Japan, the above-mentioned color mismatch.
In any event, none of the three should be discarded due to its performance—the differences among them are small.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome and appreciated.